e
have never gone, our own microkernel.
still, i see Neal,Marcus,Shapiro & a few others whose name i usually
forgot (sorry for that) carry expertise. i am open to thoughts.
-- arnuld
http://arnuld.blogspot.com/
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
into the direction that does not lead to the place
where we are trying to reach from last 23 years. we need to change.
just analyse the HURD histrory & thought over what i said for some
time.
thanks
-- arnuld
http://arnuld.blogspot.com/
--
arnuld
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> It has been my plan for a long time, but needed to much work effort to be
> done immediatelly. So I postponed it. Has now perhaps the time come to
> revisit this topic, in context of just having lost http (port 80)
of why it is stopped.
I have these questions:
(1) What do you guys think of this ? agreement, disagreement, hate
this crazy idea, ? or look at this guy named arnuld, he is completely
insane, thinking of rewriting 20 years of work into some new language
in next 2 years.
(2) is there any
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> arnuld uttre writes:
>The hardware has gone beyond any imagination of virtually any
>XIX century's person, but the English language that we're
>currently using is still pretty mu
n contribute to the development of
GNU/HURD OS on L4 microkernel. I am just learning but
in the coming months I will develop myself and will
learn PERL, LISP and 'C' too( as told by Eric S.
Raymond in "How to become a Hacker"). Tell me how can
I contribute, if my skills
