On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:57:50 +0100
Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Hope this helps!
> ... because this is a Debian testing system and they're still using a
> 2.3-based glibc. That's probably it. If someone has easy access to a
> system with a really recent GCC 4.1 or GCC 4.2
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:57:50 +0100
Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops, that was on PPC. Let me try this again ;-)
Note that while it's an AMD 64 chip, it's running in full 32-bit mode with no
64 bit anything. Hope that helps.
> #v+
> $ echo 'void f (void) { volatile char a[8]; a[
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:08:02 -0600
Neill Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more time, this time adding the -ffreestanding option after the
-fstack-protector option:
> > $ echo 'void f (void) { volatile char a[8]; a[3]; }' | gcc -S -x c -O2
> > -fstack-protector
