On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:04 PM Samuel Thibault via Libc-alpha
wrote:
>
> (leaving gcc out, it's really out of the story, it just happens to
> expose support for ifunc)
>
> Joseph Myers, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 20:05:44 +, a ecrit:
> > /scratch/jmyers/glibc-bot/install/compilers/i686-gnu/lib/gcc
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:24 PM Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Samuel Thibault, le mar. 19 janv. 2021 01:21:05 +0100, a ecrit:
> > H.J. Lu, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 16:17:16 -0800, a ecrit:
> > > Why doesn't hurd ld.so build script mark strncpy as needed?
> >
> > I
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:40 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:24 PM Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> >
> > Samuel Thibault, le mar. 19 janv. 2021 01:21:05 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > H.J. Lu, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 16:17:16 -0800, a ecrit:
> > > >
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 1:02 AM Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 18:24:48 -0800, a ecrit:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:40 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:24 PM Samuel Thibault
> > > wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:26 AM Adhemerval Zanella
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19/01/2021 09:21, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 1:02 AM Samuel Thibault
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 18:24:48 -0800, a
, but not any checkable
> preprocessor macros.
>
> Alternatively: maybe this part of cpu-features.c should be moved into
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/64/cpu-features.c and #include_next the
> common cpu-features.c?
>
Or something like this.
--
H.J.
From 24090a219d8bf902db530bfd9b
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:43 AM Sergey Bugaev wrote:
>
> Normally, in static builds, the first code that runs is _start, in e.g.
> sysdeps/x86_64/start.S, which quickly calls __libc_start_main, passing
> it the argv etc. Among the first things __libc_start_main does is
> initializing the tunables
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Joseph Myers, on lun. 02 avril 2018 14:22:28 +, wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Apr 2018, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>
>> > This means that build-glibcs i686-gnu now builds fine. Among the
>> > remaining TODOs, there are
>>
>> Thanks! I'd
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> H.J. Lu, on lun. 02 avril 2018 09:01:30 -0700, wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Samuel Thibault
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Joseph Myers, on lun. 02 avril 2018 14:22:28 +, wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> H.J. Lu, on lun. 02 avril 2018 10:06:14 -0700, wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Samuel Thibault
>> wrote:
>> > H.J. Lu, on lun. 02 avril 2018 09:01:30 -0700, wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Apr
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:15 AM Sergey Bugaev wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> This is my work on the aarch64-gnu port, aka GNU/Hurd on 64-bit ARM.
>
> To build this, you need an aarch64-gnu toolchain (binutils, GCC, MIG),
> and GNU Mach headers for AArch64. I have posted the patches for
> binutils, GCC, and
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, 8:55 AM Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> 916730425594 ("elf: Add elf_backend_add_glibc_version_dependency")
> introduced adding an extra GLIBC_2.36 version dependency for x86_64. But
> on x86_64 GNU/Hurd, there has never been a glibc 2.36 port, and thus the
> GLIBC_2.36 version is no
Please open a binutils bug and CC me.
H.J.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, 9:01 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, 8:55 AM Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
>
>> 916730425594 ("elf: Add elf_backend_add_glibc_version_dependency")
>> introduced adding an extra GLIBC_2.36
13 matches
Mail list logo