Hi,
> Joan, where do think something could be missing?
Maybe a good start is to read and understand all the code of the
translator and explain what every function does. That could be useful
for others who want to contribute to the Hurd, not only on the lwip
translator. Back in my GSoC I took some
Joan Lledó, le dim. 03 mars 2019 17:25:47 +0100, a ecrit:
> If I remember correctly, poll() and ppoll() on glibc end up calling
> the io_select operation. Maybe a good exercise would be to add a new
> 'poll' operation to the pfinet interface,
What would be the difference with the io_select operati
Missatge de Samuel Thibault del dia dg., 3
de març 2019 a les 17:39:
>
> What would be the difference with the io_select operation?
> The real difference between select() and poll() is the way to express a
> set of fds, and that does not show up in the RPCs anyway.
Mmm, yeah, that's right. Then I
Hi, and excuse my delay:
Did you got to solve this?
How can I reproduce your workaround?
El Lunes 18 de febrero de 2019, Vinay M escribió:
> Hi Almudena,
>
> To give some more context, earlier versions of "ifconfig" was working fine.
> Recently we upgraded to MAC 10.13.6 and latest inetutils
On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 07:04 -0800, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le lun. 25 févr. 2019 10:25:01 +0100, a ecrit:
> > Unfortunately, the situation has not improved with it :(
> >
> > The SIGILL failures are now SIGABRT and SIGSEGV as they became with the
> > SS_DISABLE patch.
>
> It howe
Svante Signell, le dim. 03 mars 2019 23:21:55 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 07:04 -0800, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le lun. 25 févr. 2019 10:25:01 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > Unfortunately, the situation has not improved with it :(
> > >
> > > The SIGILL failures are now SIGABR
Hi Team,
I was able to fix this by following - https://medium
.com/@david.limkys/permanently-create-an-ifconfig-loopback-alias-macos-b7c93a8b0db
Thanks for reply and support.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 11:51 PM Almudena Garcia
wrote:
> Hi, and excuse my delay:
>
> Did you got to solve this?
>
> Ho
