Re: Glibc port: commit clenup

2018-02-19 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 00:44 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on dim. 18 févr. 2018 00:40:57 +0100, wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-02-17 at 22:59 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Maybe I can try to help out here after being AFK for a month. Where > > is > > upstream? > > You mean upstream

Re: Glibc port: commit clenup

2018-02-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, on lun. 19 févr. 2018 18:51:12 +0100, wrote: > I've found the upstream upstream repo thanks. So, what is the > procedure, create a branch http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/glibc. > git/ with one patch per debian patch See the branches there, they already exist. > and ask you t

Re: Glibc port: commit clenup

2018-02-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on lun. 19 févr. 2018 19:04:57 +0100, wrote: > See the branches there, they already exist. > > > and ask you to commit upstream upstream? > > If it was a matter of committing, that'd be done already... See what I > wrote on 18 Jan 2018: > > « > Most of them don't have changelog,

Re: Glibc port: commit clenup

2018-02-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20/02/18 11:03, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on lun. 19 févr. 2018 19:04:57 +0100, wrote: >> See the branches there, they already exist. >> >>> and ask you to commit upstream upstream? >> >> If it was a matter of committing, that'd be done already... See what I >> wrote on 18 Jan 20

Re: Glibc port: commit clenup

2018-02-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Amos Jeffries, on mar. 20 févr. 2018 12:51:45 +1300, wrote: > By "whole repository" do you mean the history needs rewriting for > changelog automation, or just the working tree HEAD? We'd just import the HEAD :) Samuel

Re: Glibc port: commit clenup

2018-02-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on mar. 20 févr. 2018 08:34:22 +0100, wrote: > Amos Jeffries, on mar. 20 févr. 2018 12:51:45 +1300, wrote: > > By "whole repository" do you mean the history needs rewriting for > > changelog automation, or just the working tree HEAD? > > We'd just import the HEAD :) (thus changel