On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 18:01 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on lun. 25 sept. 2017 17:51:52 +0200, wrote:
> > The following tests still reveal unwanted behaviour: (where to change ?)
These two tests are now OK.
> It's in the PATH lookup case, just below where you added your code.
Svante Signell, on mar. 26 sept. 2017 16:15:06 +0200, wrote:
> + /* Relative path */
> + else
> + {
> + cwd = getcwd (NULL, 0);
> + if (cwd == NULL)
> + goto out;
> +
> + res = asprintf (&concat_name, "%s/%s", cwd, file);
That should be
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 16:24 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> That should be “filename” instead of “file”.
Yes of course. That was merely a copy/paste error. Thanks for finding it.
> Take the case of PATH containing e.g. :bin: , and your current directory
> contains a bin directory which contains
Hello,
This time it looks correct :)
(just a couple of nitpicks which I'll just fix).
Samuel
Hello,
Joan Lledó, on mer. 06 sept. 2017 10:09:36 +0200, wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lwip/iioctl-ops.c
> +/* Get the interface from its name */
> +static struct netif *
> +get_if (char *name)
...
> +
> + netif = netif_list;
> + while (netif != 0)
> +{
> + if (strcmp (netif_get_state
Samuel Thibault, on mer. 27 sept. 2017 00:44:15 +0200, wrote:
> Last but not least, did you try to run the glibc testsuite while running
> this TCP/IP stack? It would probably find potential bugs. Also, the
> perl testsuite is probably a nice thing to run.
(I'm not saying I won't commit this wor
