Hi,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:37:04AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Roland McGrath skribis:
> > Frankly I think it would be better to keep these single-caller
> > interfaces out of libc proper. It's not really ideal that they are
> > there for Linux either, but syscall stubs are less of an i
Hello,
Olaf Buddenhagen, le Wed 05 Aug 2015 19:53:11 +0200, a écrit :
> Having said that, *if* it's actually common practice nowadays to
> (mis)use the mount(2) call directly, I'd say it *might* indeed be more
> convenient to implement a compatibility wrapper at the libc level...
14 packages in d
