[PATCH gnumach] Add protected payloads to NEWS

--- NEWS | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 9a9f620..357b23f 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Numerous cleanups and stylistic fixes of the code base. Several problems have been identified using static analysis tools and subsequently been fixe

Re: [PATCH gnumach] Add protected payloads to NEWS

Ack. Justus Winter, le Wed 01 Oct 2014 15:57:14 +0200, a écrit : > --- > NEWS | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS > index 9a9f620..357b23f 100644 > --- a/NEWS > +++ b/NEWS > @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Numerous cleanups and stylistic fixes of the code base. > Several

Re: [PATCH gnumach] Add protected payloads to NEWS

On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:57:14PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > +A protected payload can now be associated with capabilities. This > +payload is attached by the kernel to delivered messages and can be > +used to speed up the object lookup in the receiving task. Very good job, looking forward to

Re: [PATCH gnumach] Add protected payloads to NEWS

Richard Braun, le Wed 01 Oct 2014 16:59:57 +0200, a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:57:14PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > > +A protected payload can now be associated with capabilities. This > > +payload is attached by the kernel to delivered messages and can be > > +used to speed up the obje

Re: [PATCH 7/7] procfs: provide magic retry response for /proc/self

> > + "proc/self/..." means replace `proc/self' with the PID of the current > > +process and then retry as for FS_RETRY_NORMAL. > > Roland, does it look OK to use a FS_RETRY_MAGICAL for implementing > /proc/self? FS_RETRY_MAGICAL is appropriate. But the string itself should m

Re: [PATCH,Hurd] Fix F_*LK* fcntl with __USE_FILE_OFFSET64

> 2014-08-31 Samuel Thibault > > struct flock64 uses 64bit values. This introduces other values for > F_GETLK, F_SETLK, F_SETLKW to distinguish between both. > > * sysdeps/mach/hurd/bits/fcntl.h (F_GETLK64, F_SETLK64, F_SETLKW64): > New No blank line between the (opt

mtab and firmlink loop

Hello, We're having issues with schroot and mtab on exodar. Looking a bit at rpctrace, one can see things like this: /home/srv/chroot/schroot-unpack/youpi/home/srv/chroot/schroot-unpack/youpi/home/srv/chroot/schroot-unpack/youpi/home/srv/chroot/schroot-unpack/youpi/home/srv/chroot/schroot-unpack/

It says HURD 0.6 should be released somewhere in 2013. It's not

Hey guys, I've recently learned about GNU HURD, I'm a linux user. But not a programmer. So I'm sorry I can't help :(. But I do have a question. I was looking up the source code of the HURD on savannah, even though I dont know how to read it, I still like to look at it XD. But something that struck

Re: It says HURD 0.6 should be released somewhere in 2013. It's not

Andrew Staunder, le Wed 01 Oct 2014 18:55:51 -0700, a écrit : > 2013-XX-XX > Version 0.6 That only means 0.5 was released in 2013. Nothing more. > Are there a list of improvements or anything that have happened since the > last release? That has just been added to the NEWS file a few days ago.