Re: [patch] for mig check in GDB's configure

Hi! On Fri, 17 May 2013 09:30:42 +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > After reviewing and testing it, I now checked in your patch (very minor > > coding style and wording changes). Congratulations to your first > > contribution! :-) > > > > 2013-05-16 Yue Lu > > > > * configure.ac: Ensure

Re: [patch] for mig check in GDB's configure

> No, we have not yet started that process -- but indeed perhaps already > should. Yue, the GDB project, as part of the GNU project, requires > copyright assignment for any substantial changes, > . For simplicity, I suggest > you use the »assignment fo

Re: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)

Hi! On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:35:37 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 12:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2012/09/msg00018.html > > replied to here gdb has a PATH_MAX issue [...] > should be sent upstream: where to report, bug-...@gnu.org?

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

Hi! One suggestion up-front: I think the GCC mailing lists (or generally all hosted on sourceware.org/gcc.gnu.org) are configured to drop HTML email, so you may want to adjust your MUA. On Fri, 17 May 2013 00:19:17 +0300, Fotis Koutoulakis wrote: > > Replacing the (legacy) threadvars > > mecha

Re: Inquiry about GCC Summer Of Code project idea.

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Fotis Koutoulakis wrote: > > Last but not least, I would like to know if you have some other proposition > for me. Mr Ian could have a suggestion for the go part perhaps? Make sure you can build and modify gccgo for some other target, e.g., GNU/Linux. I don't eve

Re: Imminent Debian GNU/Hurd release

On Tue, 14 May 2013, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > It'd be really good that people help us with sorting out the > promotional stuff on the wiki. It's typically the kind of things that > take time while not being technical, so I don't see any reason why > this couldn't be done by other people than the