Re: GNU Mach

2013-02-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Thomas Schwinge skribis: >> I'd advise using the package from Debian. > > Generally a good suggestions, yet MIG from Savannah Git should be fine, > too. Note that anyone trying the MiG tarball from ftp.gnu.org will be surprised. There really ought to be a new tarball of current Git uploaded the

Re: GNU Mach

2013-02-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Please keep bug-hurd in Cc. Mailing only a couple persons is asking for bad luck that they are on vacancy. Kevin Madhu, le Tue 19 Feb 2013 18:14:08 +0530, a écrit : > I am using code from Savannah Git, So you mean MIG from its git repository? I don't see any reason why it should fail. Samuel

Re: GNU Mach

2013-02-19 Thread Kevin Madhu
Hi, I pulled the code from git repository only and its up-to-date(mig - http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/mig.git/, mach - http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/gnumach.git/). And following the instructions, I successfully compiled mig but mach always produces that error. > mig -n -cc c