Re: [PATCH,HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step7x, almost complete rewrite finished

2013-02-18 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 19:59 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Fri 15 Feb 2013 10:54:44 +0100, a écrit : > > So it's ii-1 whose array position gets _hurd_port_free()d. array > position ii does *not* get _hurd_port_free()d, while > > > /* If one descriptor is bogus

Re: [PATCH,HURD][RFC] hurdselect: Step7x, almost complete rewrite finished

2013-02-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Mon 18 Feb 2013 17:13:10 +0100, a écrit : > > This does _hurd_port_free() array position ii, even if it is actually > > undefined since _hurd_port_get returning MACH_PORT_NULL means it didn't > > work (and thus didn't fill the array position). > > So the correct change would be

Re: GNU Mach

2013-02-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Kevin Madhu, le Mon 18 Feb 2013 19:17:06 +0530, a écrit : > The errors displayed when I try compiling the code(following > http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/microkernel/mach/ > gnumach/building.html) is given as attachment. > mig -n -cc cat - /dev/null\ > -user vm/memory_object_user.use

Re: GNU Mach

2013-02-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:56:31 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Kevin Madhu, le Mon 18 Feb 2013 19:17:06 +0530, a écrit : > > The errors displayed when I try compiling the code(following > > http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/microkernel/mach/ > > gnumach/building.html) is given as attachment. >