On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 08:46 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:24:46AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > We warned you several times about making your changes as little
> > > intrusive as possible for easier review. Since you seem to be unable to
> > > understand what that im
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:07 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > - the rewritten code is faster than the old one. In the old code no
> > delay is needed for the POLL case but is for the rewritten code. i.e.
> > it's faster. (irrespective
(I will reply on the other items this evening)
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 06:51:29 +0100, a écrit :
> - you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the copyright
> papers for libc (which I of course will when asked for). This is a
> derived work of mine. Otherwise it has to stay as
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> - the rewritten code is faster than the old one. In the old code no
> delay is needed for the POLL case but is for the rewritten code. i.e.
> it's faster. (irrespective of moving timeouts to the server side or not)
I highly doubt it
> Svante Signell writes:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:07 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
[…]
>>> - you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the copyright
>>> papers for libc (which I of course will when asked for
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:32 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> (I will reply on the other items this evening)
>
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 06:51:29 +0100, a écrit :
> > - you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the copyright
> > papers for libc (which I of course will when asked
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 10:22:37 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:32 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > (I will reply on the other items this evening)
> >
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 06:51:29 +0100, a écrit :
> > > - you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sig
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:29 +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > Svante Signell writes:
> > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:07 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> […]
>
> >>> - you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 10:42:45 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:29 +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > > Svante Signell writes:
> > > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:07 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
>
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 10:45:56 +0100, a écrit :
> here, in the rewritten version even the algorithm itself is completely
> different.
Which was actually the whole motivation for the rewrite, rather than
basing on the available implementation.
Samuel
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:38 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 10:22:37 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:32 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Anyway, until next time no copyright assignment is needed...
>
> If you consider working on libc again (and ac
Hi!
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:48:13 +0100, Svante Signell
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:38 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > If you consider working on libc again (and actually it's also true for
> > hurd and gnumach), you should probably still assign copyright already,
> > so it's done by then
The project suggestion below was written for Rust programmers, and would be
common knowledge for GNU Hurd developers, due to the subject of GSOC 2013
coming up on the Rust reddit.com forum. If interested in this could you
please go to
http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/18dfd6/gsoc_2013_started_a
13 matches
Mail list logo
