Thomas Thomas, le Mon 30 Apr 2012 16:30:00 -0700, a écrit :
> Nextly, it uses cthread_data to store a pointer to a thread-specific buffer
> that it uses in paging. As I see it: all threads are created when the pager
> starts up, and no threads are created afterward. Thus, I could achieve the
> same
Hello,
(From http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670478 )
cp/parent-perm-race tries to copy a fifo with the --copy-contents
option. The problem is that cp still uses O_NOFOLLOW in that case,
strace shows:
open("mode/fifo", O_RDONLY|O_NOFOLLOW)
O_NOFOLLOW is actually normally meant
Eric Blake, le Tue 08 May 2012 12:46:57 -0600, a écrit :
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html
> O_NOFOLLOW
> If path names a symbolic link, fail and set errno to [ELOOP].
>
> I wouldn't object to yet another O_* flag that can be used to disable
> translators,
Hi,
Samuel Thibault skribis:
> Eric Blake, le Tue 08 May 2012 12:46:57 -0600, a écrit :
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html
>> O_NOFOLLOW
>> If path names a symbolic link, fail and set errno to [ELOOP].
>>
>> I wouldn't object to yet another O_* flag that
On 05/08/2012 12:39 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> (From http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670477 )
>
> Hello,
>
> The misc/nice test currently fails on hurd-i386 because the nice support
> there is not precise enough: the Mach kernel, which handles scheduling
> priorities, has only
Hi Ludo!
On Tue, 8 May 2012 17:30:13 +0200, Hydra Build Daemon
wrote:
> This is to let you know that Hydra build 2550872 of job
> gnu:hurd-master:qemu_tests.build has changed from 'Failed with non-zero exit
> code' to 'Success'.
>
> Complete build information can be found on this page:
> htt
It would be. I don't write a lot of mutli-threaded code,
and I did not know that GCC supported __thread.
Well, now I know.
The implementation is much cleaner now.
Thanks,
Thomas
- Original Message -
From: Samuel Thibault
To: Thomas Thomas
Cc: "bug-hurd@gnu.org"
Sent: Tuesday, May 8,
> Hi!
Howdy.
>On Sun, 6 May 2012 09:25:11 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Thomas
>wrote:
>> I played around and got it to compile, though how I did so is a nasty hack.
>What kind of?
I caught the output of make to get the full compile command and added
../libpthread/cancel-cond.o into it manually, and
Hi!
On Tue, 8 May 2012 19:16:09 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Thomas
wrote:
> >On Sun, 6 May 2012 09:25:11 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Thomas
> >wrote:
> >> I played around and got it to compile, though how I did so is a nasty hack.
>
> >What kind of?
>
> I caught the output of make to get the full compile co
