Andrew Pollock, le Wed 11 Jan 2012 22:12:11 -0800, a écrit :
> I'm expecting to have a face-to-face meeting with the ISC DHCP folks next
> week,
> and the Hurd situation is one of the topics of discussion. If the stakeholders
> from debian-hurd want me to convey anything in particular, then now's
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 21 Jan 2012 23:45:24 +0100, a écrit :
> Andrew Pollock, le Wed 11 Jan 2012 22:12:11 -0800, a écrit :
> > I'm expecting to have a face-to-face meeting with the ISC DHCP folks next
> > week,
> > and the Hurd situation is one of the topics of discussion. If the
> > stakeholde
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:42:06AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Sat 21 Jan 2012 23:45:24 +0100, a écrit :
> > Andrew Pollock, le Wed 11 Jan 2012 22:12:11 -0800, a écrit :
> > > I'm expecting to have a face-to-face meeting with the ISC DHCP folks next
> > > week,
> > > and th
Andrew Pollock, le Sat 21 Jan 2012 15:57:50 -0800, a écrit :
> > - the PATH_MAX fix, which they _can_ check on GNU/Linux, since GNU/Linux
> > uses glibc.
>
> One of the concerns with this patch was that it was conditional not on the
> Hurd OS, but on glibc being in use. I think they'd rather see t
gian pendola, le Sat 31 Dec 2011 18:35:58 -0800, a écrit :
> clib-routines.o:(.eh_frame+0x3b1e): more undefined references to
> `__gcc_personality_v0' follow
>
> Trying to sort out what's happening, but I just get that it has something to
> do
> about statically linking and/or compiler directives
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:12:15AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Andrew Pollock, le Sat 21 Jan 2012 15:57:50 -0800, a écrit :
> > > - the PATH_MAX fix, which they _can_ check on GNU/Linux, since GNU/Linux
> > > uses glibc.
> >
> > One of the concerns with this patch was that it was conditional n
