Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > you still need a way to access the actual burner... I don't
> > really know, but I rather doubt that any VM solution actually exposes
> > the host system's burner to the guest system as an ATA
Hi,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:54:27PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:19:57 +0200, Tanguy LE CARROUR
> wrote:
> > let me know if you have a "top 5" list of simple things that have to
> > be done.
>
> Simple things... What's that? ;-) I'll try to think about some.
> Ar
Hi,
As Tuesday turned out problematic for many of the main contributors, we
will meet Wednesday instead this week. (At 19:00 UTC on irc.freenode.net
#hurd as usual.)
This is still not ideal for everyone; so it might change again. Monday
was proposed, as well as changing the time. (Two hours earli
do you all ever hold meetings on saturdays?
what day of the week are most of you off from work?
On 5/22/11, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As Tuesday turned out problematic for many of the main contributors, we
> will meet Wednesday instead this week. (At 19:00 UTC on irc.freenode.ne
Hello,
The last installation CD mounting issues are fixed, I've generated a
netinst image, which should thus always be able to install the base
system. I will probably not generate netboot (AKA mini) images any more,
only netinst images, since the former are so likely to unexpectedly
break, as exp
