Re: emacs23.3 issues and hurd signals

2011-05-08 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 01:54 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Thu 05 May 2011 19:11:10 +0200, a écrit : > > Backtraces are attached! > > Could you also run disassemble, so we get the corresponding assembly > code? > > Also, maybe the issue is in some thread other than main, so >

user-level drivers

2011-05-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, I've started having a look at Zheng Da's user-level driver integration. I've cleaned his tree a bit, and now considering adding patches to the debian packages for wider testing. The patches however add a few kernel RPCs, which we should probably agree on first, at the minimum that their ex

Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Making PyHurd build again under cython 0.14.1.

2011-05-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:40:39PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > At Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:05:55 +0200, wrote: > > > It is quite rough (copied a file from cython, needs to be included > > > cleanly). > > > > What would "included cleanly" mean? And why is it necessary? > > The file is a

Re: forwarded proposal to finance some hurd work

2011-05-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:33:24PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > For the GSoC, we got more good applications than we can accept (which > is obviously limited by Google). My idea is that we could perhaps use > the money Tanguy is offering for paying another GSoC project on our > own? It's

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:41:23PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I meanwhile downloaded machuse.ps which drives my gv to the edge of > madness. It starts at page 20 and i can only go backwards page by > page. Probably i should make 20 screenshots for reading them in > sequence. You could tr

Re: [scdbac...@gmx.net: Interface for SCSI transactions ?]

2011-05-08 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 08:42:53PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > > So i would rather propose a new function with the semantics of > > > SG_IO: > > > > A completely hurdish interface for this would probably be the best, > > yes. [...] > I understand the recent statements about the reason be