Hi,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:02:58AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Tue 29 Mar 2011 01:57:07 +0200, a écrit :
> > BTW, talking about copyright: did you file a copyright assignment
> > for the Hurd yet?
>
> I've already asked it, the answer is no, and I've given him
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:50:59PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Tue 29 Mar 2011 18:17:34 +0200, a écrit :
> > Note that the Hurd console also has a number of drawbacks. (One of which
> > you actually mention later on: not seeing kernel messages. But there are
>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:30:13AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 18:17 +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:27:31AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Also note that using the "screen" program on Mach console is also a
> > pretty good choic
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:32:49AM -0300, Diego Nieto Cid wrote:
> There's a crucial part not taken from X.Org, the parser :)
I see... I guess this can be avoided once we switch to libxkbcommon :-)
-antrik-
