Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

2011-03-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 08:50:39 +0100, a écrit : > I have now working scripts dhclient-script.hurd and dhclient-script.hurd.udeb Ok, good, please post them for review. > Both udeb for Linux and kfreeBSD have strange constructs I've not been > able to find out about, e.g. > > new_mask

Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

2011-03-01 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 08:50:39 +0100, a écrit : > > I have now working scripts dhclient-script.hurd and > > dhclient-script.hurd.udeb > > Ok, good, please post them for review. Attached below, with debug output by adding se

Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

2011-03-01 Thread Diego Nieto Cid
2011/3/1 Samuel Thibault : > Didn't we have working equivalent in our latest dhcp script? > The script I tried wasn't even calling ifconfig succesfully. IIRC, the command line arguments weren't accepted. But as settrans was called afterwards everything appeared to work fine.

Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

2011-03-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 20:50:33 +0100, a écrit : > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 08:50:39 +0100, a écrit : > > > I have now working scripts dhclient-script.hurd and > > > dhclient-script.hurd.udeb > > > > Ok, good, ple

Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

2011-03-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Diego Nieto Cid, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 18:09:24 -0300, a écrit : > 2011/3/1 Samuel Thibault : > > Didn't we have working equivalent in our latest dhcp script? > > > > The script I tried wasn't even calling ifconfig succesfully. IIRC, the > command line arguments weren't accepted. Ok. > But as settr

Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

2011-03-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 20:50:33 +0100, a écrit : > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 08:50:39 +0100, a écrit : > > > I have now working scripts dhclient-script.hurd and > > > dhclient-script.hurd.udeb > > > > Ok, g

link(dir,name) should fail with EPERM

2011-03-01 Thread Eric Blake
POSIX states that this should fail with EPERM, not EISDIR: $ mkdir d $ link d c This was detected by the gnulib testsuite; I've since updated that testsuite to tolerate Hurd's current behavior, but it might be worth updating link(2) to comply with the standard. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com

Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

2011-03-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
I forgot to comment on the udeb version: I don't think we want to create an inetutils-tools udeb package, while we can simply issue settrans which should be easy and fine enough, since we only handle one interface, thus my changes. Samuel