Hi,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:01:04AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> --help is not the place to describe everything about the system.
Sure, but being *somewhat* more verbose certainly can't hurt...
Either way, I assume a patch that adds *only* the "(default)" bit would
be uncontroversial?
-an
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Mon 14 Feb 2011 08:45:42 +0100, a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:01:04AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > --help is not the place to describe everything about the system.
>
> Sure, but being *somewhat* more verbose certainly can't hurt...
>
> Either way, I ass
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:50:36AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Roland McGrath, le Tue 15 Feb 2011 19:10:34 -0800, a écrit :
> > "Start TRANSLATOR and set it as NODE's active translator" might be
> > more clear, though perhaps too long.
> Maybe simply
>
> "Start and set NODE's active tra
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 07:02:46PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Some days ago "(default)" was added for "-p". I think it'd be good if
> clarification is added that -a and -p are not mutually exclusive.
> Something like ""Set NODE's active translator. Can be combined with
> --passive."
Indeed
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 06:00:10PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Perhaps what would both be appropriate for --help and satisfy the
> apparent intent behind your changes, is to add a short paragraph about
> what active and passive translators are to the "doc" text after the
> \v, so it appear
Svante Signell, le Thu 17 Feb 2011 06:52:52 +0100, a écrit :
> > > However, I found some trouble with hardware types identified with an
> > > integer bigger than 255 (ARPHRD_IEEE802_TR and ARPHRD_FDDI) and I gave
> > > up. Leaving them out when compiling for GNU is probably the easiest
> > > workar
