On 31/10/2010 15:39, Roland McGrath wrote:
> If ED is a problem, then it should just be removed. It's only there as a
> joke. That said, my recollection is that POSIX does reserve all E[A-Z0-9]+
> macro names to the implementation for uses. But I don't really
> recall if that's so.
Considering
Hi,
I just used qemu-kvm to run my Hurd for the first time, and it is fast, really
fast!
Just wanted to share the experience :)
(I’ve got a new CPU which supports KVM).
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Manuel Menal, le Sun 31 Oct 2010 23:13:18 +0100, a écrit :
> I've included a change for the documentation as well.
Could you avoid reformating paragraphs? It makes finding out the actual
changes tedious.
Samuel
Roland McGrath, le Sun 31 Oct 2010 07:39:20 -0700, a écrit :
> If ED is a problem, then it should just be removed. It's only there as a
> joke. That said, my recollection is that POSIX does reserve all E[A-Z0-9]+
> macro names to the implementation for uses. But I don't really
> recall if that'
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Although having a reserved, generic error code macro might be
> > useful(?), `ED' is a very generic identifier. For example, clang
> > uses it in many parts of its code, which makes the build fail on
> > GNU/Hurd. I think it's likely that we
