Re: unionmount branches

Hello, On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:37:31AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:20:45PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > Just to make sure: I can push the mount patch series (starting with > > ``Add the --mount command line option'' to ``Add the mountee to the > > list of mer

Re: additional questions

Hi, On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 10:27:12PM +0100, Jakub Daniel wrote: > I read a paper about mach not being the best choice of microkernel for > hurd. There are various comments to that effect floating around the net -- some well-founded, some myths... > And I also know that viengoos has been in de

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Implement mountee startup.

Hi, On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:53:46PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:05:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:28:37AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > + /* Fetch the effective UIDs of the unionfs process. */ > > > + nuids = geteui

Re: [PATCH] Implement the sync libnetfs stubs.

Hi, I think it's ready to go now :-) -antrik-

Re: man: pipeline

Hi, On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 10:27:12PM +0100, Jakub Daniel wrote: > when i tried to examine man page of dpkg i got the following error > (not right away but after i scrolled to line 129 or similar): > > man: pipeline.c:1671: pipeline_peek_skop: Assertion `len <= > p->peek_offset' failed. This i