Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:16:32PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> I said it before, and I'll say it again now: the Hurd does not need
> more users, it does not even need a lot more developers, it just need
> a few *really smart* developers.
Perhaps you should attend a presentation on communit
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:28:37AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> + /* Fetch the effective UIDs of the unionfs process. */
> + nuids = geteuids (0, 0);
> + if (nuids < 0)
> +return EPERM;
> + uids = alloca (nuids * sizeof (uid_t));
> +
> + nuids = geteuids (nuids, uids);
> + assert
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:18:45AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> [...] Thus, if I did everything correctly, it seems that we have no
> problems syncing really read-only filesystems either.
Great :-) That's what I hoped for, just wanted to be sure.
> +assert (err == 0);
Another thing yo
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:58:07PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > It is actually a problem that this policy is not followed whenever
> > an intermediate translator hands out a "real" port to another
> > transl
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sun 22 Nov 2009 22:04:22 +0100, a écrit :
> (BTW, I don't actually agree on the "really smart developers only" part
> either. Unless you are among those who believe that any work on the
> existing implementation is pointless, and only working on a new
> microkernel would
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:05:16PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:28:37AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > + /* Fetch the effective UIDs of the unionfs process. */
> > + nuids = geteuids (0, 0);
> > + if (nuids < 0)
> > +return EPERM;
> > + uids =
