Re: [PATCH 2/3] Implement mountee startup.

2009-11-17 Thread unlimitedscolobb
Hello, On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 10:10:43PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:37:54AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > > Well, I can't really give a final ACK without seeing the whole p

Re: Adding entries to a directory

2009-11-17 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > > > > Well, obviously, O_READ permission on a directory is sufficient to > > > create files in it. > > > > Ah, interesting... > > > > > I'm

[PATCH 3/3] Add the mountee to the list of merged filesystems.

2009-11-17 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
* mount.c (start_mountee): Add the mountee's filesystem to the list of merged filesystems. * node.c (node_init_root): Take into consideration the fact that an empty string refers to the mountee root. * ulfs.c (ulfs_check): Likewise. (ulfs_register): Don't check whether "" is a valid directory. ---

[PATCH] Implement the sync libnetfs stubs.

2009-11-17 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
* netfs.c (netfs_attempt_sync): Sync every directory associated with the supplied node. (netfs_attempt_syncfs): Send file_syncfs to every directory maintained by unionfs. --- Hello, On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:58:31AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 06:56:41PM +0200

Re: Adding entries to a directory

2009-11-17 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:57:46AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > > > > > > Well, obviously, O_READ permission on a directory is sufficient to >

Re: website: background color in css

2009-11-17 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/11/17 Arne Babenhauserheide : > Am Montag, 16. November 2009 23:07:33 schrieb Michal Suchanek: >> It's not all or none. You can use different text style and size, >> alignment, spacing, borders, ... and colors. >> >> But whenever you touch an aspect of the site, be it colors, text >> style, or

Re: website: background color in css

2009-11-17 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 14:32:29 schrieb Michal Suchanek: > Similarly, if you want to put a single warning sign somewhere in > yellow on red then you just add it. If you want your site to have some > particular text color you better ensure that you define a background > on which the text is

Re: website: background color in css

2009-11-17 Thread Michal Suchanek
2009/11/17 Arne Babenhauserheide : > Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 14:32:29 schrieb Michal Suchanek: >> Similarly, if you want to put a single warning sign somewhere in >> yellow on red then you just add it. If you want your site to have some >> particular text color you better ensure that you def

Re: Adding entries to a directory

2009-11-17 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:57:46AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:29:54PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > >

Re: website: background color in css

2009-11-17 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:58:44AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 01:42:19 schrieb > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > > (Not everyone likes reading text on a white background! It > > regularily makes my eyes hurt. I wonder what morons created the myth > > that i

Re: OT: automation

2009-11-17 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Samstag, 14. November 2009 23:57:07 schrieb > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > > > How can you best reach that goal? > > > > What goal exactly?... > > Having a gui and a cli interface to every command. Still not sure wh

Re: website: background color in css

2009-11-17 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:17:59PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Sonntag, 15. November 2009 19:44:57 schrieb Michal Suchanek: > > So you can either have completely colorless pages > > ...and lose the wide range of options you have when you use colors for > different parts of the

cthreads vs. pthreads (was: GNU/Hurd in german news)

2009-11-17 Thread olafBuddenhagen
hi, On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:57:32AM +0800, Da Zheng wrote: > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Da Zheng, le Sun 15 Nov 2009 12:05:01 +0800, a écrit : > >> I thought GNOME or KDE couldn't work because Hurd components or > >> libraries were still using cthreads instead of pthreads. > > > > I don't see

Re: OT: automation

2009-11-17 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:51:29AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > How about a server which exposes dbus interfaces via the filesystem to > give instant benefit for dbus-enabled programs? > > Would that be doable? Yeah, I guess so... -antrik-

Re: Adding entries to a directory

2009-11-17 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:49:24PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:57:46AM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > > > On Thu, No

Re: website: background color in css

2009-11-17 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 00:35:30 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > It's actually perfectly OK > to override text colors for emphasis in specific bits of text -- if you > also override the background color *for these same bits of text*. The > rest of the page can keep default colors for both

Re: website: background color in css

2009-11-17 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 00:31:30 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > No idea what you mean. If a user sets his default background color, we > can safely assume that he also sets a matching default text color... The Konqueror bug I cited is the problem, not the Hurd Website. Sadly it took m

Re: Adding entries to a directory

2009-11-17 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:20:03PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:49:24PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:15:59PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > No, I think you're confusing authentication and access control. > Authentication

Re: OT: automation

2009-11-17 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Hi, Am Montag, 16. November 2009 23:25:16 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net: > Still not sure what you want to know. Are you asking for a technical > design description? For a roadmap? Or yet something else?... I just meant the question as a prompt to you, no explicit roadmap request or similar,

Re: Adding entries to a directory

2009-11-17 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:21:18PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > > My idea was that a unionfs *run* by root can recreate any auth object > > > > that the client has and then authenticate with it against the unioned > > > > directories. > > > > > > > > If run by any other user then it can

Re: Adding entries to a directory

2009-11-17 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > > > As explained above this assumes that the file permissions tell the > > > whole story. The main problem with my suggestion is that it might be > > > too restrictive. For instance, if user Alice wants to add an ent