Hi,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:40:08PM +0100, Flávio Cruz wrote:
> Yes, the CVS branch only contains the aggregation of the original
> commits and I agree on keeping the original version (non-CVS-branch).
Just to be sure: is this true also for the changes you did after first
merging stuff into t
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:38:08PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:58:52AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:46:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:59:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > > wrote:
>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:44:59PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> I think that file_syncfs is equivalent to fsys_syncfs, the difference
> being in the target of invocation (file_syncfs is invoked on a port to
> a file, while fsys_syncfs is invoked on the control port).
Yeah, that's my underst
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Samstag, 24. Oktober 2009 06:08:49 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> Yay, reviving the thread! ;)
Sorry, couldn't resist... :-)
> If you use the system for tracking your coding and occassionally
> merging with cha
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:06:21PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 03:25:39AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > I still don't understand why you think that the current hardcoded
> > "descend into all directories, then match all subdirectories against
> > foo" i
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 01:57:17PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Samstag, 24. Oktober 2009 06:10:38 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > Complexity? I still think that Git is actually very simple in its
> > fundamental concepts. It only seems complex to people who haven't
> > yet f
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:14:08PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Samstag, 24. Oktober 2009 09:03:10 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > I only write scripts for stuff that requires a lot of commands, or
> > that I do *very* often -- precisely so I *have* to remember the
> > comman
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:22:28AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:38:08PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I'd like to have a snapshotting filesystem at my box, because having
> > experienced the possibility to roll anything back in git, I'd be happy
>
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:44:20AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:06:21PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 03:25:39AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > I still don't understand why you think that the current hardcod
Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2009 10:54:44 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > If you don't have to integrate hundreds of branches, then there's no
> > merit in learning how to do that efficiently - so it isn't efficient
> > to have to learn background for that before being able to use the
> > system e
Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2009 11:23:59 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> That's a very bad thing to do. I hate all these mmv and other bullshit
mmv?
> *much* more valuable knowledge than usage of any specific scripts. This
> generic knowledge, once obtained, can be reused in all kinds of
> situa
Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2009 11:08:47 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> Yes, it takes more then a few hours: reading enough of the Git
> documentation in order to truly understand the concepts, probably
> requires a couple of days.
>
> But for people programming 200 days a year, this investment w
Am Montag, 26. Oktober 2009 07:22:28 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> I have some vague ideas how such partial subhurds could be used; but not
> really much of an idea how such a setup would look like exactly...
> Probably needs some very concrete use case(s) to work from.
Can you think of some?
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 05:23:13PM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2009 11:23:59 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > That's a very bad thing to do. I hate all these mmv and other bullshit
>
> mmv?
I've heard of this for the first time, too :-)
google (``ma
14 matches
Mail list logo
