Software (and text) management

Hello! Instead of following up to each email individually, I'll combine some answers in here. On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:28:09PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. September 2009 09:08:23 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > > I can see your point, but please note that if I were to think

Source repositories, unionmount code

Hello! Instead of following up to each email individually, I'll combine some answers in here. On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:45:34AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 04:04:19PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > How did the GSoC work out? > > antrik gave me a passing fin

News 2009-08-31, documentation, wiki

Hello! Instead of following up to each email individually, I'll combine some answers in here. On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 04:04:19PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > It's time again for news > Or did you merge in more of the old code repositories into git? > > And while I'm asking ( :) ): Wh

Is there interest in Hurd people meeting at: [...@gnu.org: GNU Hackers Meeting Registration - Gothenburg 2009]

Hello! Please see the attached email. Is there interest among Hurd people to meet there? Regards, Thomas --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Registration is now open for the GNU Hackers Meeting on 11-13 November in Gothenburg, Sweden. It is being held jointly

Re: hurd-web/hurd/translator/unionmount.mdwn

Hello, On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:28:09PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. September 2009 09:08:23 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > > However, while writing this, it occurred to me that I could as well > > put the short description into hurd-web/user/scolobb . After all, > > since th

Re: News 2009-08-31

Hello, On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:52:28PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. September 2009 17:07:01 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > > git://github.com/scolobb/unionmount.git > > I assume from the discussion, that this will not be the final > destination. Am I right in that? Accordin

Re: --nomount without -u

Hello, This has already been discussed on the IRC, and I will simply mention the decision that has been taking in the live discussion. On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:21:38AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:07:20AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > >sett

Re: Source repositories, unionmount code

Hi, Am Montag, 28. September 2009 10:16:15 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > > > Note that as opposed to some other translators (like Zheng's > > > eth-multiplexer), both unionfs and nsmux were designed to be > > > stand-alone, > > > > ...which is the reason why I still haven't tested nsmux -- I'm still

Re: Software (and text) management

Hi, Am Montag, 28. September 2009 10:15:59 schrieb Thomas Schwinge: > Nice descriptions! I keep it like Olaf in this with my Mails on this list: If you spot anything you want to reuse, just treat it as if the copyrigth was assigned to the FSF :-) > > can throw off everything (I hope Thomas

Re: hurd-web/hurd/translator/unionmount.mdwn

Am Montag, 28. September 2009 17:16:01 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > I have finally run into a period of time which I could dedicate to the > Hurd: I have just updated my own page, have put the information from > hurd/translator/unionmount.mdwn into hurd/translator/unionfs.mdwn (I > hope I understood co