---
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:08:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I'm sending in my attempt to compile a unionfs documentation. It is
> > formatted as a stand-alone Texinfo file for now, so that I am able to
Hello,
Recently I have been browsing the code implementing the stowing
feature in unionfs it struck me that I cannot figure out the reason
for it to be implemented in the way it is.
Normally the stowing feature works as follows: one starts unionfs in
the following way:
$ settrans -a unionfs --
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:00:10AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:08:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> Sergiu, then please remove the shadowfs reference(s) from the GNU
> Hurd Refere
Hello,
Thank you for the swift response!
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> I do agree that it's counter-intuitive. Please note that the stow
> functionality was mostly meant for the GNU system as a base for a --
> rather complex I'd say -- packaging system.
>
> Th
Hi Sergiu,
I do agree that it's counter-intuitive. Please note that the stow
functionality was mostly meant for the GNU system as a base for a --
rather complex I'd say -- packaging system.
The idea was that the first level after the stow directory was the
package, and we were matching against pa
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Sergiu
Ivanov wrote:
> I see... It has never occurred to me that unionfs could be used in a
> packaging system :-)
There are things you don't really want to know about the Hurd. :-)
> I wonder whether there is still the necessity to keep things as they
> are. I
sir i want fresh dumps that's why i m doing register in u r site, i don't know
how is possib...
pls sand me detail, how can i do it.
