Re: subhurds etc. (was: Hiding nodes with unionmount)

2009-08-18 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:59:49AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:14:32AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > And it would be nice to be able to just use the same base Hurd for the > > main hurd and all subhurds - it needs a readonly mounted partit

Re: Personalized Filesystem (was: Hiding nodes with unionmount)

2009-08-18 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:07:20AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:26:11PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > > Is it possible to just unionmount / on another node and then chroot to > > it? > > Yes, that should work: > >settrans myroot unionfs

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Give the mountee the port to the real underlying node in transparent mode.

2009-08-18 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
>From 48b2e49b18023ffc7b137350dfc61505417b048b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergiu Ivanov Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:02:05 + Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Give the mountee the port to the real underlying node in transparent mode. * mount.c (start_mountee): Provide the mountee with the port to the rea

Re: unionfs Documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 08:06:28PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:00:10AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 05:08:28AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 09:23:23AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH] Implement the sync libnetfs stubs.

2009-08-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 08:57:46PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:30:30AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Please, please, please, let's try to finally get some of these patches > > installed before discussing matters to death. > > The real problem is n

Re: [PATCH] Implement the sync libnetfs stubs.

2009-08-18 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:04:07PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 08:57:46PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > > The origianl patch is wrong and needs to be reverted, and a new one > > comitted once all concerns actually have been addressed. > > A follow-up