Hi,
The current news read like this:
> Samuel Thibault uploaded a new version of the `hurd`
> [[Debian_package|hurd/running/debian]] which improves stability.
> [[Sergiu_Ivanov|user/scolobb]] implemented most of the
> functionality of [[union_mounts|hurd/translator/unionmount]] which allows
Hi,
Would it be possible to hide a node via unionmount?
For example I might want to remove a file from the underlying node when I
replace it with a new but differently named one (i.e. lib.so.1 -> lib.so.3).
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Unpolitisch sein
heißt polit
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:14:06AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Would it be possible to hide a node via unionmount?
>
> For example I might want to remove a file from the underlying node when I
> replace it with a new but differently named one (i.e. lib.so.1 -> lib.so.3).
Not rea
Hi Ivan,
Welcome to the active writers on the bug-hurd list!
(since you've been here for a while a simple welcome might be out of place ;)
).
Am Freitag, 24. Juli 2009 00:29:19 schrieb Ivan Malone:
> This will be a long post. And I hope I dont bore you. This is my first
> attempt at contribut
Hi Fredrik,
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009 10:48:00 schrieb Carl Fredrik Hammar:
> A cleaner solution would be to first mount a hypothetical ``filterfs''
> that removes the files, and then do a unionmount on top of that. Also you
> could just simply set a lib.so.1 -> lib.so.3 symlink in the mounte
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:12:03AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009 10:48:00 schrieb Carl Fredrik Hammar:
> > A cleaner solution would be to first mount a hypothetical ``filterfs''
> > that removes the files, and then do a unionmount on top of that. Also y
Hello,
First of all, thank you for your being the news man :-)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:57:39AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> @scolobb: I took the info from your userpage in the wiki. Is there a way how
> for people to access your code? Is it on github like nsmux?
Unfourtunately, mos
Hi,
I've gotten a basic implementation of server provided ioctl handlers
working. In which I unconditionally load a server provided module
containing the handlers on every call to ioctl, and then immediately
unload the module. I would like to discuss some details of the current
implementation.
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:12:46AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> This is just a thought that suddenly struck me, I figure I'll get it
> out so I don't forget it.
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:58:01PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > +/* Shutdown the filesystem; flags are as for fsys_
Hi scolobb,
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009 14:37:39 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > $ settrans -a / mine /mnt/usb/arne.tbz
>
> You mean union-mounting ``mine'' here, right? Note that you still
> require root privileges to set a translator on / . (At least I'm not
> allowed to do that in my instance of
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009 14:49:03 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> First of all, thank you for your being the news man :-)
*gg* why do I hear "ice cream man" echoing in my head ;-)
I try to contribute in the way I can, and writing these news is the best way I
see. I don't have the time to tackle a
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 04:16:46AM +0100, Ivan Malone wrote:
> Those of you working on unionmount? Do you think unionmount could be
> made to work this way, or does it already?
Well, unionmount is not yet production ready, since it still requires
some work to bring it to a state sufficie
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:38:43PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009 14:49:03 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > First of all, thank you for your being the news man :-)
>
> *gg* why do I hear "ice cream man" echoing in my head ;-)
I love ice-cream :-D If you do,
13 matches
Mail list logo
