I just put the mission stement into the wiki
(that's the beauty of using the wiki as staging area for the website: I can
just change something and upload it, and if it isn't good enough for the
website, we can work on it till it is).
http://www.bddebian.com:/~hurd-web/
Also I added Olafs
On Thursday, 4. June 2009 13:45:55 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> And I just spotted something missing: The word "free" :)
I forgot to add the reasoning:
Even though people who know GNU should know that GNU only uses free software,
but this mission statement will (hopefully) also be read by peo
Hi,
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:50:01AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> > > ioctl()s are always specific to a particular device class, and thus
> > > the server(s) implementing (or proxying) it. It makes perfect sense
> > > for a server implementing a specific device, also to provide the
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:09:06AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> I just got a "gnu hurd" news alert which talked about Genode, so took
> a quick look at it, and it seems like Hurd and Genode could benefit
> from some code- sharing.
I don't think so... As we know by now, even sharing
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:47:25AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> How much of the code from last years GSoC has already been merged into
> the mainline Hurd?
Some of the Mach patches from Adrei have been merged by Samuel in a
timely manner, but others had outstanding issues, so they
I wonder, is there a chance of getting GNU Mach to run as an
user-mode application under a different (e. g., GNU/Linux, or
Mach-based GNU/Hurd itself) system? Is there any significant
issues, beyond of simply severing all the ties to the real
hardware (and p
Ivan Shmakov, le Fri 05 Jun 2009 21:01:26 +0700, a écrit :
> I wonder, is there a chance of getting GNU Mach to run as an
> user-mode application under a different (e. g., GNU/Linux, or
> Mach-based GNU/Hurd itself) system?
Chances always exist. Developers time, no.
> * T
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>> I wonder, is there a chance of getting GNU Mach to run as an
>> user-mode application under a different (e. g., GNU/Linux, or
>> Mach-based GNU/Hurd itself) system?
> Chances always exist. Developers time, no.
Surely. Not quite the answer I've hope
Ivan Shmakov, le Fri 05 Jun 2009 22:01:26 +0700, a écrit :
> >> * The time and qualification necessary to deploy one or more
> >> GNU/Linux systems on a single host using User-Mode Linux is (to my
> >> experience) significantly lower than for the other solutions (KVM,
> >> Xen)
>
> > For Xen
> Samuel Thibault writes:
* The time and qualification necessary to deploy one or more
GNU/Linux systems on a single host using User-Mode Linux is (to my
experience) significantly lower than for the other solutions (KVM,
Xen)
>>> For Xen I agree. For KVM, I don't.
Ivan Shmakov, le Fri 05 Jun 2009 22:26:46 +0700, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> * The time and qualification necessary to deploy one or more
> GNU/Linux systems on a single host using User-Mode Linux is (to my
> experience) significantly lower than for the other s
> Samuel Thibault writes:
[...]
>> With the latter being said, I wonder, wouldn't the changes necessary
>> to run GNU Mach in user-mode be similar to those already done to
>> make it suitable for Xen?
> The thing is: Xen provides you with pagetable-like operations so it's
> quite easy
Ivan Shmakov, le Sat 06 Jun 2009 00:13:19 +0700, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> >> With the latter being said, I wonder, wouldn't the changes necessary
> >> to run GNU Mach in user-mode be similar to those already done to
> >> make it suitable for Xen?
>
> > The thing is: Xen
13 matches
Mail list logo
