Re: Does the cross toolchain really work?

newper, le Fri 16 Jan 2009 11:31:59 +0800, a écrit : > No,I don't use any pre-compiled binaries,I'm trying to compile the > whole hurd system from sources. Then did you apply the TLS patch to the hurd source? It can be checked out from svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-hurd/hurd/trunk/debian/patches it

Re: Does the cross toolchain really work?

2009/1/16 Samuel Thibault : > newper, le Fri 16 Jan 2009 11:31:59 +0800, a écrit : >> No,I don't use any pre-compiled binaries,I'm trying to compile the >> whole hurd system from sources. > > Then did you apply the TLS patch to the hurd source? > It can be checked out from > svn://svn.debian.org/sv

Re: Moving to git

Hi, On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:50:58PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 12:05:07AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > The old CVS repositories will of course remain available for history > inspectio

Splitting the Hurd tree

Hi, On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:50:58PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 12:05:07AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > Rationale: split as far as it's still making sense. There is > > >

Re: a design flaw when associating a user to a process?

Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:12:13AM +, Da Zheng wrote: > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: >> Are you saying that if a task fails to register itself with the proc >> server, it can not be associated with any user, i.e. only root can >> kill the task? That would be a serious security problem f

Merging branches (was: Moving to git)

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:41:45PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Do you think it is worthwhile to preserve your individual commits? Note that this is something to be decided by the maintainers accepting the changes, not the developer who created them... Though admittedly in this case there is n

Re: looking for the solution of rootless subhurd

Hi, On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:29:02PM +, Da Zheng wrote: > I just found that there are two RPCs that can change the kernel ports > of tasks and threads: thread_set_kernel_port and > task_set_kernel_port. Mach does provide an easy way to override these > two ports:-) That's great news :-)

Re: Moving to git

Hi, On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:41:39PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > That libpthread should be split of (before doing the conversion) is OK > for everyone? No, better do it afterwards. I allows us to postpone the decision whether to preserve full history or not: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:50:

Re: Improving object mobility within the Hurd

Hi, On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:56:15PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:50:28AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > > I've split the project into three main parts: improving authority > > > verification, improving code transfer and an object system that > > >

Re: Moving to git

Hello, Roland McGrath writes: > But AFAIK git-cvsimport alone is easy enough to get right. We converted Guile's CVS repo (where there were a number of branches, several of which were active) to Git several months ago. The first attempt used `git-cvsimport' and was a failure, because this tool

Re: Merging branches (was: Moving to git)

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM, wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:41:45PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > And, didn't (some of) the GSoCers work in git branches nevertheless? > > Yes: Two worked with git, one with svn, one with hg (IIRC). > > > Wouldn't we be able to directly import that > >

Re: looking for the solution of rootless subhurd

Hi, On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:03 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:29:02PM +, Da Zheng wrote: > > > I just found that there are two RPCs that can change the kernel ports > > of tasks and threads: thread_set_kernel_port and > > task_set_kernel_port. Mach does provide an easy w