Hi,
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:41:08AM +0100, Davi Leal wrote:
> If you port a driver you should take into account the license such
> driver use. IMHO the Hurd should go towards full GPLv3 compatibility.
Currently the drivers live in GNU Mach, which is a dependency of the
actual Hurd, but other
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:56:10PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2008/11/25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The situation is really quite simple: A system designed to support
> > use cases like DRM is unquestionably bad from a GNU viewpoint -- not
> > only because it helps DRM specifically, but b
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:58:07PM +0100, Ruben Pollan wrote:
> I'm student of computer engineering on spain. I'm about to finish my
> degree (5 years of study). I have to do a master's thesis, I'm
> interesting on hurd and I think will be a good idea do something about
> hurd.
>
> I don't h
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 07:49:18PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:27 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you mean that we will have to proxy *each* control port?
>
> Well, we need to make sure that t
Hi Olaf,
Firstoff: Thank you!
This is information I hoped for!
Am Mittwoch 03 Dezember 2008 13:57:12 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> When a process needs the service of another process which deals with
> resources it has no access to itself -- say a powerbox -- it doesn't
> launch that process i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > If you port a driver you should take into account the license such
> > driver use. IMHO the Hurd should go towards full GPLv3 compatibility.
>
> Currently the drivers live in GNU Mach, which is a dependency of the
> actual Hurd, but otherwise they are quite disconnecte
Proposal: Add to the list the below one, as a long term goal.
* The possibility to get a kernel "GPLv3 or later" compatible.
