Am Donnerstag 26 Juni 2008 00:25:28 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> You are confusing things. Usability is *not* the same as intuitiveness.
> Intuitiveness is only *one* element of usability. (And IMHO one that is
> overrated by most usability people...)
[...]
> Mercurial's interface *might* be more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:44:51PM +0200, zhengda wrote:
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
Yes of course. If we want to override the TCP/IP stack, that doesn't
mean we want to override the pipe server as well, or the other way
round...
I think using the symbolic link t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. If the translator is set in the passive mode, it is started by the
file system server. It seems that I don't have a chance to override
its proc server.
These should be fixable by reversing the command I think:
settrans -afgpc /root/socket2/2 proc_proxy /root/h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"root could delegate access to the real network interface, and the
user could run a hypervisor"? How do we do it? create another program
that is run by root and that communicates with the hypervisor?
To be honest, I don't know the details. In a capability system,
zhengda, le Thu 26 Jun 2008 19:31:12 +0200, a écrit :
> >Hm... Something seems wrong with the indentation here -- but it looks as
> >if it has been already wrong in the original code... Can you fix that
> >please?
> >
> >Oh, and of course you still need a changelog entry. There is a section
> >in t
