On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 05:16:47 +0200
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> but also other things like the fact that
> Savannah offers git hosting but no Mercurial hosting.
Actually that's no true now :-)
According last news from sv.gnu.org Mercurial are supported.
See https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/fo
Hi Olaf,
>
> >
> > Thats the reason I thought I should maintain a Changelog. Also I want
> > it for my own reference later.
>
> Well, you can always look up the history in git. If you prefer it in a
> text file, there are scripts that extract the commit messages and
> generate a file from them.
>
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "-u" is more tricky that "-gunzip", as it doesn't skip one specific
> translator, but rather filters a whole class. While it is certainly
> possible to implement this also by means of a generic filter translator
> with some more
Am Dienstag 03 Juni 2008 05:16:47 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> How accessible it is, depends first and foremost on what most people
> know. That probably leaves Mercurial and git as the only serious
> contenders...
And after that it depends on the fact how easy it is to learn it from the
things m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Well, I must remind you that you were supposed to provide a schedule in
your application... I accepted your not doing so, because the task
description was very unspecific, and you were not really in a position
to provide a schedule without discussing things first; but
Sorry for the double-posting. I hit send by accident.
Am Dienstag 03 Juni 2008 05:16:47 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> How accessible it is, depends first and foremost on what most people
> know. That probably leaves Mercurial and git as the only serious
> contenders...
That's right.
And after t
> Arne Babenhauserheide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> The total disk usage for the two repositories will typically be less
>> than the doubled disk usage for any one of them. (As the
> Mercurial offers the same, for GNU/Linux and Windows.
Indeed.
I assume that it
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [...] but I'd prefer to see the Hurd development more accessible,
>> and even though there are many good candidates, Mercurial is best
>> suited for that, at least in my opinion.
> How accessible it is, depends first and foremost on what most people
> kno
