Re: __libc_stack_end is broken?

Hi, Michael Casadevall, le Tue 28 Aug 2007 20:43:02 -0400, a écrit : > I discovered __libc_stack_end is (seemingly) broken. It seems on > Linux, this points to the end the stack for the process, but on > Hurd this is broken (it points at an invalid location outside of a > processes address space).

Terminology, Or: The Nature of Channels (was: Re: Channel sessions)

Hi, On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:14:38PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > Channel instances are pretty much of an internal detail IMHO. > >> > When a user

Generic Junctions (was: Re: Channel sessions)

Hi, On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:14:38PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > First a slight change in terminology, I will call an in-tee a > `broadcast' and an out-tee simply a `tee'. Well, for one, "broadcast" doesn't really fit here strictly speaking -- multicast se

Packeting (was: Re: Channel sessions)

Hi, On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:14:38PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > >> But one might be able to use generic junctions if one layers a > >> channel that makes sure all reads and writes are

A Vison Regarding Channels (was: Re: Channel sessions)

Hi, On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 02:14:38PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > I'm not familiar with `kitten', and it didn't turn up in any of the > searches I made. But I like its name :-), could you give me some > pointers to where it's described? I don't think it is described anywhere. Maybe it