[bug #19439] ``Kernel page fault at address 0x1d'' in `setup_rw_floppy', `linux/dev/drivers/block/floppy.c:1447'

2007-03-28 Thread Thomas Schwinge
URL: Summary: ``Kernel page fault at address 0x1d'' in `setup_rw_floppy', `linux/dev/drivers/block/floppy.c:1447' Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: tschwinge Submitted on: Wednesday 03/28/07 at 14:

[bug #19439] ``Kernel page fault at address 0x1d'' in `setup_rw_floppy', `linux/dev/drivers/block/floppy.c:1447'

2007-03-28 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of bug #19439 (project hurd): Priority:None => 1 - Later Wiki-like text discussion box: => Repeating this once more after having restarted the system got the file system attached just fine. Too bad. _

[bug #19425] fatfs can't handle QEMU's virtual fat block device

2007-03-28 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of bug #19425 (project hurd): Wiki-like text discussion box: => A first fat image to work on -- ``Store is smaller then implied by metadata'' -- has been installed into `flubber:~tschwinge/tmp/fat-images/': `a.img'. Linux can mount that one without complaining.

Alternative to './configure' ?

2007-03-28 Thread Ashish Gokhale
Hello, It looks like 'configure' script has been removed from gnumach-1-branch. Is there any alternative to this script? is it a temporary state of the repository? my local copy of sources is broken & i am not able to build the kernel. Thank you, Ashish Gokhale

Re: Alternative to './configure' ?

2007-03-28 Thread Barry deFreese
Ashish Gokhale wrote: Hello, It looks like 'configure' script has been removed from gnumach-1-branch. Is there any alternative to this script? is it a temporary state of the repository? my local copy of sources is broken & i am not able to build the kernel. Thank you, Ashish Gokhale Ashish

Re: Alternative to './configure' ?

2007-03-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Ashish Gokhale, le Wed 28 Mar 2007 16:01:58 +0100, a écrit : > It looks like 'configure' script has been removed from > gnumach-1-branch. Like for most projects. You just need to run autoreconf -f -i for generating it. Samuel ___ Bug-hurd mailing

Re: Alternative to './configure' ?

2007-03-28 Thread Ashish Gokhale
--- Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ashish Gokhale, le Wed 28 Mar 2007 16:01:58 +0100, a > écrit : > > It looks like 'configure' script has been removed > from > > gnumach-1-branch. > > Like for most projects. You just need to run > autoreconf -f -i for > generating it. > >

Re: Alternative to './configure' ?

2007-03-28 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:07:15PM +0100, Ashish Gokhale wrote: > Which version of autoconf & automake should I use? > > I am running debian linux kernel version 3.1 > autoconf-2.59a, automake-1.8.5 & m4-1.4.2 > > I get undefined macro error > --- > linux/configfrag.ac:126: error: m4_def

Re: GNU Hurd SoC projects

2007-03-28 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:47:09PM +0800, Wei Shen wrote: > On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For comparision, did you evaluate the straight-forward approach to > check > >environment variables in libc *before* the name lookup? I.e. instead > >of diverting the name lookup of the default locatio

Re: GNU Hurd SoC projects

2007-03-28 Thread Wei Shen
HI, On 3/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, That's what I mean, yes. (Replacing before calling hurd_file_name_lookup().) > If so, how can we handle the case that applications directly call > hurd_file_name_lookup to find a server? Interesting question... Of course, this