Hello!
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:21:14PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> BTW, why is the CVS holding generated files like configure & co? Since
> we all have variouns versios of autoconf/automake, the cvs diff output
> is cluttered with useless hooks.
Correct. I followed that practice of the p
[Cced to .]
Hello!
This is about porting GRUB to Xen to allow booting a GNU/Hurd system as a
Xen domU.
GNU/Hurd systems use GNU Mach as a microkernel and have a GRUB
configuration like the following one, which is currently not translatable
to a Xen configuration:
#v+
title Debian GNU/Hurd
kerne
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:21:14PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 02 Jan 2007 12:10:49 +0100, a ?crit :
> > Do you have your development tree publically available?
>
> I only often update the patch at
>
> http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/patch-gnumach-xen
>
Hello!
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 01:38:58AM +0100, I wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 04:15:18PM +0100, christian nastasi wrote:
> > how can I proceed to test the mach_debug interface? What kind of test do you
> > suggest me to verify it work properly in kernel? It seems that give some
> > result, b
Hello!
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:36:21AM +0200, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
> Currently, uml does not support device handling from user space
> nor has been ported to any os other than linux. However, it is
> just a user space process, so i'm not pessimistic about porting it
> to the Hurd.
>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:55:21PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> I don't have a general objection against changing that practice.
>
> What are others's opinions?
I had similar problems when working on the sound system (which is, by
the way, suspended due to bugs I'm unable to solve currently).
