Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Roland McGrath
> Roland, what do you prefer? Based on that I will then send in patches > also for the other *utimes.c files, which have similar problems, as the > code looks like. I haven't figured out what you think this is fixing. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hur

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Roland McGrath, le Tue 10 Oct 2006 00:16:25 -0700, a écrit : > > Roland, what do you prefer? Based on that I will then send in patches > > also for the other *utimes.c files, which have similar problems, as the > > code looks like. > > I haven't figured out what you think this is fixing. Glibc i

Re: mach4 & gnumach/oskit...

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 02:20:06AM -0400, Mach wrote: > Hi, I was interested in jumping back into playing around with lites/mach.. > Anyway I'm having a really hard time building any mach system. > > I've tried the mach4 source under Slakware 7.1, it builds, but is unable to > boot. I've

Re: mach 4

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:56:30PM +0900, girish wrote: > >>my plan is to port mach kernel to MIPS Malta evaluation board. i > >>have done some experience on porting NetBSD & Linux kernels for > >>MIPS Malta board. idea is to experiment with mach threads vis-a- > >>vis NPTL/ TLS of

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Roland McGrath
Thanks for the clarification. I committed a libc change that should work. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Roland McGrath, le Tue 10 Oct 2006 02:29:12 -0700, a écrit : > Thanks for the clarification. I committed a libc change that should work. Thanks. Unions make the "may alias" link, indeed. Samuel ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists

Re: mach4 & gnumach/oskit...

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello again! On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:16:26AM +0200, I wrote: > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 02:20:06AM -0400, Mach wrote: > > I've tried to build gnumach, but I need libc & other stuff from hurd, > > That's not true in this form. To build the GNU Mach from > gnumach-1-branch (which is the only one

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Roland McGrath, le Tue 10 Oct 2006 02:29:12 -0700, a écrit : > Thanks for the clarification. I committed a libc change that should work. sysdeps/mach/hurd/adjtime.c sysdeps/mach/hurd/fstatvfs.c sysdeps/mach/hurd/fstatvfs64.c sysdeps/mach/hurd/readdir.c sysdeps/mach/hurd/readdir_r.c sysdeps/mach/h

Re: mach 4

2006-10-10 Thread girish
Thanks. Currently I am trying that branch on a MIPS port. There are some headers missing included from locore.S file. I am working on it. On Oct 10, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hello! On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:56:30PM +0900, girish wrote: my plan is to port mach kernel to M

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 10 Oct 2006 11:35:12 +0200, a écrit : > Roland McGrath, le Tue 10 Oct 2006 02:29:12 -0700, a écrit : > > Thanks for the clarification. I committed a libc change that should work. > > Thanks. Unions make the "may alias" link, indeed. Oops, union fields indeed alias betwee

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
And BTW, although char * aliases with any other pointer type, int* doesn't. IIRC, I saw some casts involving int*. Samuel ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hey Roland! Aren't you supposed to cure your wrist? On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:29:12AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. I committed a libc change that should work. Confirmed that it works. But may I ask why you didn't like the function to be the way Samuel and I pr

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Roland McGrath
> But may I ask why you didn't like the function to be the way Samuel and I > proposed: Did you look at the code generated and verify that it is no less efficient? ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hur

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Roland McGrath
> sysdeps/mach/hurd/adjtime.c In this example there is no actual aliasing going on, the cast is the only use of the pointer. If any other cases really do have aliasing, then send patches for those. If the compiler is shown to deal optimally with passing args as ((time_value_t) { tv->tv_sec, tv->

Re: NULL struct to futimes does not return current date/time on GNU/Hurd

2006-10-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Roland McGrath, le Tue 10 Oct 2006 11:34:10 -0700, a écrit : > > sysdeps/mach/hurd/adjtime.c > > In this example there is no actual aliasing going on, the cast is the only > use of the pointer. Indeed. And since glibc is not compiled with inter-module optimizations it does work, but with it and

[task #5975] TEST

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
URL: Summary: TEST Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: tschwinge Submitted on: Wednesday 10/11/06 at 01:33 Category: None Should Start On: Wednesday 10/11/06 at 00:00 Shoul

[task #5975] TEST

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of task #5975 (project hurd): Assigned to:None => tschwinge To be done before: => Hm. ___ Reply to this item at:

[task #5975] TEST

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of task #5975 (project hurd): To be done before: Hm. => Hm. Hm. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message

[task #5975] TEST

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of task #5975 (project hurd): Status:None => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[task #5956] Automake'ify GNU Mach's code base

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of task #5956 (project hurd): To be done before: http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?5958 --- ``GNU MIG: dependency information output'' Also: how to get these dependency files considered by the build system. http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=autom

[task #5491] Automake'ify the Hurd's code base

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Update of task #5491 (project hurd): To be done before: http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?5956 --- ``Automake'ify GNU Mach's code base'' --- we need everything that has to be done there, so do that first. Think about how to marry libtool and the Hurd libraries. => http://savannah.gnu.org/tas

RE: mach4 & gnumach/oskit...

2006-10-10 Thread Mach
Ok I downloaded the gnumach & mig from the CVS and much to my amazement I got mig to build. (I did the "make no_deps=t install-headers" in gnumach 1st, and tweaked the makefile to find the /include/mach direcotry.) Now going for gnumach it currently fails to build on gnumach/device/net_io.c line 1