I'd like to port Mach to x86_64, what should I do?

Hi every one, I'm a newbie on Mach and lack the experience. But I am going to take some effort on it. I have a x86_64 pc in my home, so I am going to port Mach to it. What should I do? ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.or

Re: I'd like to port Mach to x86_64, what should I do?

- Original Message - From: "stuarthu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 9:10 AM Subject: I'd like to port Mach to x86_64, what should I do? Hi every one, I'm a newbie on Mach and lack the experience. But I am going to take some effort on it. I have a x86_64

Re: I'd like to port Mach to x86_64, what should I do?

stuarthu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi every one, I'm a newbie on Mach and lack the experience. But I > am going to take some effort on it. I have a x86_64 pc in my home, so > I am going to port Mach to it. What should I do? Most likely it doesn't work at the moment because your interrupt

_POSIX_THREADS in

Hi Roland, I included your recent patch overhauling bits/posix_opt.h to Debian's glibc package as _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS is needed to be defiend in order to build libX11 properly. While reading the patch I noticed that you #defined _POSIX_THREADS to -1 in it. I thought we have a posix thre

Re: Google's Summer of Code 2006

On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:26:48PM -0400, I wrote: > The GNU project is participating in this year's Summer of Code, [...] > the Hurd project [...] also [...]. I installed the HTML equivavlent of the following on our top level web page, http://hurd.gnu.org/>: #v+ The GNU Hurd project will par

Re: Google's Summer of Code 2006

Thomas Schwinge wrote: > The following is a list of items you might want to work on. [...] :-O Is there particular reason for dropping Xen port for GNU Mach? Regards, ogi ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list

Re: _POSIX_THREADS in

> While reading the patch I noticed that you #defined _POSIX_THREADS to -1 > in it. I thought we have a posix thread implementation provided by > libpthread, so I am a bit confused. Is this about something else? I won't define it until we have a real libpthread implementation that interacts corr

Re: _POSIX_THREADS in

- Original Message - From: "Roland McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael Banck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:13 PM Subject: Re: _POSIX_THREADS in While reading the patch I noticed that you #defined _POSIX_THREADS to -1 in it. I thought we have a pos

Re: Google's Summer of Code 2006

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:56:15PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: > Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > The following is a list of items you might want to work on. [...] > > :-O Is there particular reason for dropping Xen port for GNU Mach? Like I already told you: | Gianluca wanted to work on that durin

[task #5503] extended attributes

URL: Summary: extended attributes Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: tschwinge Submitted on: Friday 04/28/06 at 00:47 Category: The GNU Hurd Should St

IRC channel (was: Re: Google's Summer of Code 2006)

Hi, On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:29:16PM -0400, Thomas Schwinge wrote: [...] > please feel invited to contact us on the bug-hurd mailing list or > the #hurd IRC channel. ...on freenode.net. Why are people always forgetting to mention the server? Freenode being by far the most popular for f