Re: Remove GNU Mach's unused device drivers

> Seperate changes should have seperate headers. This is incorrect. You can say it five times, or fifty times, but it is not correct. It is correct, this has been the rule for all patches to date. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org

Re: Remove GNU Mach's unused device drivers

So, if you are volunteering to fix the driver, great. Please send the network card for the non-working driver to me. But there is no need to keep it around on the random chance that someone may someday fix it. Then we should remove all driver code that one belives is not used anylonger

Re: pcmcia-support for gnumach-1

Hi Alfred, "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >okay, still somewhat long, but here we go ... > > Thanks. Looks nice, it was tested and stuff right? well, it currently works for me, however I haven't heard of anybody else who tried it out (and succeeded). Therefore I'm looking

[bug #15807] missing FSTYPEs

URL: Summary: missing FSTYPEs Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: benasselstine Submitted on: Sun 02/19/06 at 20:36 Category: Hurd Interfaces S

Re: Remove GNU Mach's unused device drivers

"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Seperate changes should have seperate headers. > >This is incorrect. You can say it five times, or fifty times, but >it is not correct. > > It is correct, this has been the rule for all patches to date. Can you please show us where

Re: Remove GNU Mach's unused device drivers

"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Seperate changes should have seperate headers. > >This is incorrect. You can say it five times, or fifty times, but >it is not correct. > > It is correct, this has been the rule for all patches to date. No, you are incorrect. You c

Re: Remove GNU Mach's unused device drivers

"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >So, if you are volunteering to fix the driver, great. > > Please send the network card for the non-working driver to me. I don't have one. >But there is no need to keep it around on the random chance that >someone may someday fix it. >

Re: Remove GNU Mach's unused device drivers

Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Seperate changes should have seperate headers. >> >>This is incorrect. You can say it five times, or fifty times, but >>it is not correct. >> >> It is correct, this has been the rule for

Alfred M. Szmidt

Hi, I have just removed Alfred from the bug-hurd mailing list. The specific mail that triggered this, in addition to his past behaviour, is referenced below. I apologize for the late reaction. His mail was sent to the list on 31st of Jan, when I was traveling. After that, first some mailing list