On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:55:21AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>>Are you sure that changing the #ifdef to #if is the right
>>change?
>>
>> Quite, if you have specific concerns that I might have missed
>> then please speak up.
>
>Your patch is potentially a funct
Testing and feedback, as always, would be gratly appreciated!
Dunno what kind of feeback you want, the patch looks OK.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:28:51AM +0100, Gianluca Guida wrote:
> Current GNU Mach provides Linux's "software interrupts" (bottom
> halves) by calling 'linux_soft_intr' during spl switches and Linux's
> schedule() call.
> However, Mach has support for software interrupts or similar,
> obscurely ca
> P.S. Gianluca, it'd probably be a good time now to request and sign
> assignment papers for GNU Mach.
Hmph, I requested that for the Hurd and GNU Mach, but now that I look
at it, in the copyright assignment paper I signed one year ago only
GNU Hurd is mentioned.
Is that enough? At that time, mo
> 2006-02-01 Gianluca Guida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * i386/i386/spl.S (spl0) [LINUX_DEV]: Removed linux glue dependant
> code for calling linux_soft_intr.
> (splx_cli) [LINUX_DEV]: Likewise.
>
> * kern/ast.h (AST_LINUX20): New macro.
> * kern/ast.c (ast_taken): Cal
