Re: kalloc.c and recent gcc's

2005-09-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:25:29PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >Can we be sure that we don't have to also hook realloc() and >memalign()? > > I don't think so, check the code for realloc/memalign to be sure, I > don't have access to it here. I don't think they're used in the Hurd code;

Re: cv3 you need it PHÂRRMACY

2005-09-02 Thread Nyala Quiroz
  Grehop and setings, VISl.T A-PharamacyByMail Save YVE Ove% onarmacy witou CAN SAr 60 your phh us. VaIis Vler meddicatioIium Ciaagra and many othns ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:49:50AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > The attached `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.patch' makes the Hurd buildable with > gcc-4.0. A fix (to be applied after the above patch) is attached: `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.fixes.patch' The patch only fixes my previous patch, so no new Cha