Re: Hurd on bochs

2002-02-02 Thread Diego Roversi
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 12:27:20AM +0100, Olivier Péningault wrote: > I've decided to install GNU/Hurd on bochs, and it was a success. > I used Debian GNU/Hurd F2. See > http://peningault.free.fr/hurdonbochs/index.html for snapshots. > I haven't execute the native-install script (lack of time) a

Anna en vivo

2002-02-02 Thread WEB
WWW.EXTREEM.COM Note: this is not a Spam email. This email was sent to you because your email was entered in on a website requesting to be a registered subscriber. If you did not request this email, please reply to this message and type "remove"

Re: term & user space console

2002-02-02 Thread Roland McGrath
> Well, ok, I did that (of course, tioctl_tiocgeta takes the arguments a bit > differently, but that's easy), although I don't know why you set raw mode > explicitely. Because you don't want the underlying tty to do ICANON processing and so forth. > Just two issues: What about CSTOP and/or CSIZE

Re: term & user space console

2002-02-02 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:42:23PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Just two issues: What about CSTOP and/or CSIZE, do I handle it the way it > > is done for Mach devices? > > I don't understand the question. These are serial hardware settings that > should be passed down directly just like the

Re: term & user space console

2002-02-02 Thread Roland McGrath
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:42:23PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > Just two issues: What about CSTOP and/or CSIZE, do I handle it the way it > > > is done for Mach devices? > > > > I don't understand the question. These are serial hardware settings that > > should be passed down directly ju

Re: term & user space console

2002-02-02 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:53:12PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > /* Mach forces us to use the normal stop bit convention: > > two bits at 110 bps; 1 bit otherwise. */ > > Ah, that stuff is just coping with the crappiness of the Mach device code. > You can just pass down the CSTO

Re: patch to add error checking in term

2002-02-02 Thread Roland McGrath
> this patch changes the interfaces of the bottom handler to return error > values. Cool. > To keep it simple, for now every old function is changed to return 0. > The actual error checking in devio.c for example can then be added later. For devio we should examine what the drivers do and think

Re: term & user space console

2002-02-02 Thread Roland McGrath
> I am still unsure (sorry) about one thing. We reset the speed, but what > about the flags c_cflag. If we just pass them down, and they are not > honored, what do we do? For example, the character size mask. In > particular, for those bits in the flag in general, should or should we not > res

Re: term & user space console

2002-02-02 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:42:23PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > > And do I update the termstate to match reality, eg do I go back and do a > > tiocgeta and (re)set the speeds? > > Yes, I think you should do that. Particular hardware or particular drivers > will support a certain subset of poss

´ã¹è°ª ºÎ´ãµÇ½ÃÁÒ? "±Ý¿¬ÃÊ"·Î ½ÃÀÛÇϼ¼¿ä.!(±¤°í)

2002-02-02 Thread ¸¼Àº¼¼»ó
Title: ´ã¹è¿¬±â ¾ø´Â ¸¼Àº¼¼»óÀ» ¸¸µéÀÚ!   ´ã¹è°ª 2¿ù1ÀϺÎÅÍ ÃÖ°í 300¿ø¾¿ ÀÎ»ó ¡®µð½º(THIS)¡¯ µî ±¹»ê ´ã¹î°ªÀÌ 2¿ù 1ÀϺÎÅÍ °©´ç 200¿ø ¿À¸¥´Ù. ¶Ç ÀϺ»»ê ´ã¹èÀÎ ¡®¸¶ÀÏµå ¼¼ºì¡¯°ú ¹Ì±¹ Çʸ³¸ð¸®½º»çÀÇ ¡®¸»¹ö·¯ ¶óÀÌÆ®¡¯ ¡®¹öÁö´