Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:30:41AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:03:30PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > If one would like to keep *both* the information about the filesystems
> > *and* the ports to their root nodes in *a single* place, one would
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:03:30PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> If one would like to keep *both* the information about the filesystems
> *and* the ports to their root nodes in *a single* place, one would
> have two choices: either add something like a ``port'' field to each
> entry in the ul
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:23:22PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:26:10PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > You are right -- if a node contains more node_ulfs entries than there
> > are registered in ulfs_chain, then something has gone seriously
> > corrupted.
