On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:08 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 04:10:13PM +, Zheng Da wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:23 AM, wrote:
>
> > > Can you make it to the meeting this friday? (It is rather urgent, as
> > > I'm considering making a GSoC task out of it...)
> > >
> > I th
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 04:10:13PM +, Zheng Da wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:23 AM, wrote:
> > Can you make it to the meeting this friday? (It is rather urgent, as
> > I'm considering making a GSoC task out of it...)
> >
> I think it will be OK. Let's meet at 7:00pm this Friday.
By
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:23 AM, wrote:
> I thought more about it, and realized that perhaps storing the
> configuration permanently is not such a bad idea after all -- it is
> closely related to something I have considered in other contexts in the
> past: namely permanently storing translato
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 09:48:47PM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:20:41AM +, Da Zheng wrote:
> > so maybe it is better to give up the idea that the directory where
> > eth-multiplexer sits is the place to show the status of devices and
> > allow the cli
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:19:06PM +, Zheng Da wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:33 PM, wrote:
> but again, if nodes are created automatically, there will be some
> strange behavior from the filesystem's point of view. for example,
> "ls" can create an transitory node, or a user can cre
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:33 PM, wrote:
>
> No, it's not!
>
> I explicitely said that the node is *not* discarded when it is still
> used, i.e. when the device it represents is still open. It is only
> discarded when there are *no* users anymore, i.e. neither references to
> the node itself, nor t
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:50:39PM +, Da Zheng wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>> The node should go away when it no longer has any users. When pfinet
>> (or some other real user) uses a device, it will probably discard the
>> port to the FS node (resulting from file_name_lookup()
Hi,
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:20:41AM +, Da Zheng wrote:
In the current implementation, the device and the node associated to
it are created when file_name_lookup() is called. when the last
client closes the virtual device, the device is destroyed
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:20:41AM +, Da Zheng wrote:
> In the current implementation, the device and the node associated to
> it are created when file_name_lookup() is called. when the last
> client closes the virtual device, the device is destroyed along with
> the node.
>
> However,
Hi,
As antrik suggested, the virtual devices of eth-multiplexer are created
dynamically. now there is an issue of management of virtual devices.
eth-multiplexer is a netfs translator and the files in the directory on
which it sits represent its virtual devices.
At the beginning, I think the
10 matches
Mail list logo
