Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
The patches seems to make sense. I guess we need copyright assignment
for that, do we have it?
Finally the copyright assignment process is complete.
Marc. O.
Marc-Olivier Mercier, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 23:01:21 -0400, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >The patches seems to make sense. I guess we need copyright assignment
> >for that, do we have it?
>
> No, you don't. How do I proceed?
Complete the attached questionnaire and send it to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
The patches seems to make sense. I guess we need copyright assignment
for that, do we have it?
Samuel
No, you don't. How do I proceed?
-- Marc O.
Hello,
The patches seems to make sense. I guess we need copyright assignment
for that, do we have it?
Samuel
Marc-Olivier Mercier wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to used setauth and it segfaults when I passed a wrong user
name (or even a wrong group name). The problem is when the args are
parsed. In libshouldbeinlibc/ugids-argp.c, the function getpwnam_r is
used. It is assumed that getpwnam_r return non-zero
Hi all,
I tried to used setauth and it segfaults when I passed a wrong user name
(or even a wrong group name). The problem is when the args are parsed.
In libshouldbeinlibc/ugids-argp.c, the function getpwnam_r is used. It
is assumed that getpwnam_r return non-zero if the user does not exist,
