Justus Winter, on Mon 07 Mar 2016 11:40:26 +0100, wrote:
> I have a patch that revamps it so that we avoid the copying.
How would it look like? Does that mean that the fun would be called
with the htable lock held?
> The thing with the patch is (iirc) that it requires the called
> function to be
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2016-03-07 01:40:01)
> Hello,
>
> Some kind of refcount assertion failure we have been having is "refcount
> detected use-after-free!" from the call to refcounts_ref inside
> _ports_bucket_class_iterate, called for instance by the periodic sync.
> I'm thinking: what about
Hello,
Some kind of refcount assertion failure we have been having is "refcount
detected use-after-free!" from the call to refcounts_ref inside
_ports_bucket_class_iterate, called for instance by the periodic sync.
I'm thinking: what about this scenario:
- thread A calls diskfs_nput()
- that call
