On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:42:41AM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:50, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > > #177486: POSIX semaphore
> > >
> > > This implementation is not POSIX compliant.
> >
> > Oops, s
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:50, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > #177486: POSIX semaphore
> >
> > This implementation is not POSIX compliant.
>
> Oops, sorry, I mixed this up with something else. Fact is I don't have an
> opinion on
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:49:22PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > #177486: POSIX semaphore
>
> This implementation is not POSIX compliant.
Oops, sorry, I mixed this up with something else. Fact is I don't have an
opinion on that one, and it's up to Neal again.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 02:43:18PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> #184344: extern inlines in libpthread are not ansi compliant
Neal should ocmment on that one.
> #177486: POSIX semaphore
This implementation is not POSIX compliant.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http:
Hello!
please could anyone with CVS access look at the patches we
have in Debian BTS:
#184344: extern inlines in libpthread are not ansi compliant
#177486: POSIX semaphore
many debian packages are not buildable untill these patches are applied.
thanks,
--
Robert Millan
make: *** No rule to
