Re: pfinet segfaults

2007-11-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:48:55PM +0100, Stefan Siegl wrote: > Apart > from the above I think the patch is fine and should be committed if > fixed. I agree and you're the maintainer. But this will need copyright assignment papers. Regards, Thomas signature.asc Description: Digital s

Re: pfinet segfaults (was: Re: Making DHCP renew work in pfinet)

2007-11-20 Thread Stefan Siegl
Hi Michael, I've finally found some time to have a look at Christian's patch. On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:18:58PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hrm, I have the feeling this patch broke just setting /servers/socket/2 > to "/hurd/pfinet" (what corresponds to the lo device in Linux?): > > [EMAIL P

pfinet segfaults (was: Re: Making DHCP renew work in pfinet)

2007-11-20 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:03:49PM +0200, Christian Dietrich wrote: > * Stefan Siegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Oct 15 2007 23:57] wrote: > > > The whitespaces beetween -a and the ip are missing because -a, -g, -m, > > > -p, -A, -G have only optional arguments. If the argument is no passed > > > the valu