Hi,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:40:29AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > Of course, you also need to adapt the build system somewhere along
> > the way...
>
> Which way would be preferred: adapting the build system before
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:40:29AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:00:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Firstly, as I have already said (and as you have already seen), the
> > majority of my commits to my nsmux repository are very ugly.
> > Everything
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:04:33AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 01:40:29 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > > And the last question is about the integration itself: how exactly do
> > > I take my nsmux git repository and integrate it into the Hurd
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 01:40:29 schrieb olafbuddenha...@gmx.net:
> > And the last question is about the integration itself: how exactly do
> > I take my nsmux git repository and integrate it into the Hurd git
> > repository?
>
> I've never done this myself, so I actually don't know
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:00:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:53:08AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:30:46PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > Note that as opposed to some other translators (like Zheng's
> > > eth-multiplex
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:53:08AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 02:30:46PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > Note that as opposed to some other translators (like Zheng's
> > eth-multiplexer), both unionfs and nsmux were designed to be
> > stand-alone,
>
> .
