Re: nsmux: Build system

2009-11-07 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:19:47AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:13:47PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:51:57AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > >

Re: nsmux: Build system

2009-11-04 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 07:19:47AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:13:47PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > I think I have an extra argument for the second way: if I create a > > separate commit before the merge, things will stop working, > > Yeah, you a

Re: nsmux: Build system

2009-10-31 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:13:47PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:51:57AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > > Which way would be preferred: adapting the build system before the > > > merge o

nsmux: Build system

2009-10-25 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
Hello, On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:51:57AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:35:14PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:40:29AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net > > wrote: > > > > Of course, you also need to adapt the build system somewhere al